The Chess Exchange

The Chess Exchange - To Your Chess Success!

Skip to content

It is currently Sat Oct 21, 2017 3:53 pm 

This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 3 posts ] 

Previous topic | Next topic 

  Print view

Author Message
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 4:52 pm
Posts: 1
 Post subject: question on Edward Lasker's book "Chess Strategy"
PostPosted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 5:07 pm 
I have a question regarding Edward Lasker's book "Chess Strategy." You can look at the book here ... rategy.pdf

My problem is in the third and first line of the fourth paragraph on page 182. They are working off of the board layout shown on 178. I can't seem to get the pieces to move the way they are saying they should. It just wont work. Im not sure if after paragraph three you are supposed to reset the board to the position found on page 178 or not. Just once I get to the first line of the fourth paragraph the moves eventually get messy and don't work. Any one that could help I would really appreciate it. Thanks!

User avatar  Offline
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 3:34 pm
Posts: 8
Location: Bandera, Texas, USA
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 4:15 pm 
Pieces are supposed to move in a pdf document?

Or are you trolling?

User avatar  Offline
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 9:05 am
Posts: 7
Location: Save Warp
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 6:43 pm 
I think the poster means the lines don’t make sense if you follow them on a chess board. They do, but you need to follow them from the previous two paragraphs onwards. I’ll post the pic and then see if we can work this out:


EDIT: OK, I’ve worked it out. I had exactly the same problems with pieces not going where they should, then I realised I had automatically approached the old descriptive notation as I do the algebraic. The problem comes with this line: “The most natural plan is to develop the QB at K3”. I kept moving the Black Bishop on c5 to e3. But old–style descriptive notation numbers the rows 1–8 inclusive from both ends! So what to Black means King 3 actually looks, from White’s perspective, like King 6.

In other words you want to move the c8 Bishop to e6. So after the first line you get the diagram looking like this:


Then it goes like this:

2 Nd5 B×d5
3 e×d5 Ne7
4 B×f6

which leaves the board looking thusly:


RE–EDIT: Turns out I’ve bumped up a VERY old topic. Oh well… Just call me Herbert West :wink: (Re–animator)!

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 3 posts ] 

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:

Who is online

In total there is 1 user online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 1 guest (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 193 on Thu Jun 28, 2007 1:40 pm

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


ChessCentral - The Leader in Cutting-Edge Chess * Buy Fritz 12 * Buy Rybka 4 * Buy Fritz Powerbook DVD

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group

Style based on Andreas08 by Andreas Viklund and created by Elizabeth Shulman, Stop Animal Rights, Dog Training by corgipower